12-10-2015, 06:33 PM
C'est quoi le pb du BE du M2 sur Stereophile???
Surtout quand Atkynson termine par:
Once I had changed my system approach, the NAD M2 provided many nights of extended listening, with one album leading to just one more. And one more. While the M2 is relatively large and heavy for a class-D amplifier, runs warmer than you might expect, and is not inexpensive, when fed high-quality PCM data it offers sound quality that competes with that of the best conventional amplifiers. Given my long-term skepticism about the sonic benefits of PWM amplifiers, that was not what I was expecting. NAD's Masters Series M2 is a winner all the way.
Et il est passé à côté de la médiocrité du volume numérique, et il n'a pas utilisé les meilleurs drives!!! (drive CD, même HDG, tu sais ce que j'en pense, et un Mac Mini avec une interface USB/Spdif…)
Relis la conclusion en ayant bien ça en tête
Surtout quand Atkynson termine par:
Once I had changed my system approach, the NAD M2 provided many nights of extended listening, with one album leading to just one more. And one more. While the M2 is relatively large and heavy for a class-D amplifier, runs warmer than you might expect, and is not inexpensive, when fed high-quality PCM data it offers sound quality that competes with that of the best conventional amplifiers. Given my long-term skepticism about the sonic benefits of PWM amplifiers, that was not what I was expecting. NAD's Masters Series M2 is a winner all the way.
Et il est passé à côté de la médiocrité du volume numérique, et il n'a pas utilisé les meilleurs drives!!! (drive CD, même HDG, tu sais ce que j'en pense, et un Mac Mini avec une interface USB/Spdif…)
Relis la conclusion en ayant bien ça en tête
