06-18-2016, 02:58 PM
(Modification du message : 06-18-2016, 03:53 PM par a supprimer merci.)
Concernant l'utilisation des systèmes Dante dont on parle beaucoup en ce moment, voici un retour mitigé (http://www.superbestaudiofriends.org/ind...62/page-18)
"If Ethernet represents complete isolation from the PC then I think you can get 99% of the way there with a usb setup provided you have a low power, low TDP processor based pc with a solid linear PS and maybe one stage of further isolation from something like a Regen.
The Rednet was not leaps and bounds better than the sub $200 Xmos F-1. In fact I have spent the last 3 days going back and forth between the two trying to hear substantial differences. The Rednet *seems* to be a bit better in the midrange - when I think I noticed differences it was there - the mids seemed to have slightly more density and tonality and space but I would not bet money I identify the Rednet over the F-1 in a blind test.
The Rednet uses ASIO and J River could use it without issue. The Rednet does not do on the fly sample rate switching though so you have to set it to 44.1 or 96 etc. Not a great thing for those of us with lots of files with different sample rates.
BUT, the Rednet does isolate your dac from your pc completely. So if unlike me your main pc doubles as a media server the Rednet 3 (I wouldnt buy the D16 if I had to do it all over) would likely save you money and sanity in the long run. In my case the D16 is going back to sweetwater.com.
I have been following the Xmos/Rednet Head-Fi thread and I won't be posting any review of the Rednet there becasue its Head-Fi and flame wars would probably ensue."
Un autre lien intéressant (130 pages ! j'ai pas tout lu), sur des mesures effectuées sur le Regen, qui donnent lieu à pas mal de contestations: http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread...nditioners
"If Ethernet represents complete isolation from the PC then I think you can get 99% of the way there with a usb setup provided you have a low power, low TDP processor based pc with a solid linear PS and maybe one stage of further isolation from something like a Regen.
The Rednet was not leaps and bounds better than the sub $200 Xmos F-1. In fact I have spent the last 3 days going back and forth between the two trying to hear substantial differences. The Rednet *seems* to be a bit better in the midrange - when I think I noticed differences it was there - the mids seemed to have slightly more density and tonality and space but I would not bet money I identify the Rednet over the F-1 in a blind test.
The Rednet uses ASIO and J River could use it without issue. The Rednet does not do on the fly sample rate switching though so you have to set it to 44.1 or 96 etc. Not a great thing for those of us with lots of files with different sample rates.
BUT, the Rednet does isolate your dac from your pc completely. So if unlike me your main pc doubles as a media server the Rednet 3 (I wouldnt buy the D16 if I had to do it all over) would likely save you money and sanity in the long run. In my case the D16 is going back to sweetwater.com.
I have been following the Xmos/Rednet Head-Fi thread and I won't be posting any review of the Rednet there becasue its Head-Fi and flame wars would probably ensue."
Un autre lien intéressant (130 pages ! j'ai pas tout lu), sur des mesures effectuées sur le Regen, qui donnent lieu à pas mal de contestations: http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread...nditioners